Post here every time you are disappointed by no Green 2.0 news

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I can save you 400+ pages if you want.

He thinks shamans can compete with mages in group dps. Also thinks they’re better than clerics as a group healer at 60.

The evidence he’s provided thus far was a random solo video and a group video doing about 15 dps over 2 hours.

Crede is providing strawmen because he cannot provide evidence. It is one of the many reasons this thread https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=406923 has gone on so long. He's usually reasonable in other threads, so I am not sure why he keeps doing it.

He cannot seem to accept that a duo/trio/four player group is killing things that are mostly tankable with Slow/Torpor, which is why a Cleric isn't required for a group like that. Shaman/Enchanter/Monk is a very strong trio, as an example.

The point of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jG1Aat1XdbI wasn't to show maximum DPS potential of a Shaman, which he would know if he actually read the thread. He often times doesn't based on what he posts. It is to show that you can use a solo video like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XwiGKTuu2E to mimic group DPS and provide an accurate example of a specific class's DPS.

The idea that you couldn't use a solo video to show class DPS was one of key reasons for this thread containing hundreds of pages of trolling with things like gifs.

I am not sure why Crede thinks a pickup group with a 54 Necromancer and a 57 Enchanter in HS west is going to be an example of a maximum efficiency level 60 group. I certainly never said that.

I have provided multiple videos and math examples for my claims, while he still provides nothing.