How was /list received on Green?

[loramin]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This has been discussed before. The answer was no. Move along, pleb.

A well-detailed, well-reasoned, and insightful rebuttal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Tilien [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My only problem with this is that different classes can solo different content at different levels (duh). From my experience on Live I could join a group as a cleric and get an equal roll on an item without being able to solo kill level appropriate nameds.

That's a legitimate critique, but it goes beyond /list. The way they've done the rules in general here highly favors soloers over groups, because they reduce things down to the soloer case for simplicity.

A simple example: per the Play Nice Policies a soloer can hold one camp. A group of six players can hold ... one camp.

Clearly, these rules encourage soloing over grouping (six soloers can hold six camps, a group can only hold one). But unfortunately, I don't see a way around it. Supporting groups better (whether for normal camp disputes or auto-GMed /list camps) would seem to add too much complication for our all-volunteer staff.