Quote:
Originally Posted by Basanos
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's almost like this narrative pushed by misogynists is at odds with itself
Here's the psuedo-science I perceive with this type of argument:
1.) Males have a biological imperative to impregnate as many women as possible
2.) Females have a biological imperative to get impregnated multiple times by a single man
3.) Males want promiscuous women for point 1
4.) Males want non-promiscuous women for point 2
The sum of this is from a woman's perspective, men want women to be chaste, while being permitted socially to be not-chaste themselves. Would you think that seemed fair if it happened to you? Feminism is the natural result of this friction
|
It doesn't say if females have a reason to object to promiscuous males. Surrogate mistresses used to be a thing.