![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
![]() Here's a real (shorter) overview for people with brains that work correctly: Mages are unquestionably a better choice in 99% of cases for a DPS class in a group setting if shaman heals/utility isn't vital. Enchanters lvl 12+ solo better than warriors without major twinking. A parse of a twinked warrior outdpsing a charmed pet means nothing and the parse itself is questionable at best. Without fungi the warrior has a fair bit of inevitable downtime and a well played enchanter has minimal. A point that has been brought up 5 or 6 times and repeatedly been ignored/dismissed in favor of posting more badly done parses. Even with major twinking somewhere around 30-40 they're still going to wipe the floor with warrior solo ability. OP picked a non min/max group comp and their choice (while totally fine) does not have any bearing on what the best setup is. If OP picked 4 rangers it doesn't magically make it the right answer. DSM's logic is extremely flawed and tends to be biased in favor of whatever argument he's trying to make at the time. Likely has a mental disorder of some kind. Actually believes there's a huge audience of silent readers of this thread that are learning valuable information from his over 500 posts in this thread while he mocks 7 other posters for having 500 combined.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
|
|