In case you had any doubt about the Democrat agenda

[BlackBellamy]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just so everyone knows, CRT is a graduate level course. Meaning you already have an AA and a masters, like 4-8 years of college, then you can pay to take CRT. So... Anyone that says some school is teaching it at a K-12 school is lying. Its simply not available for people to just learn willy nilly from a textbook.

The right has hijacked the word CRT to mean "anything i dont like or think i dont like"

Ok so if people who do have masters and 300 years of college and all the credentials you require, if those people create slideshows and curricula and training materials using CRT tenets, and then they train teachers and school staff then you can claim with 100% certitude that CRT is not being taught in schools.

That's your argument I think? That CRT is a thing that is only offered on a graduate level as a university course. That it's not a broadly-held social theory that is influential in corporate and learning settings?

I like your strawman argument where you say all those who don't agree with you don't understand CRT. I like the use of the loaded word 'hijacking' like disagreeing with a description proffered by partisan ideologues makes you a criminal.

I understand CRT and I disagree with it. I think it's wrong. I think it's fails as a social theory because it's tenets are untestable and all it's claims are just that, claims. None of it is evidence based and I would like to point out that absolutely any criticism of the theory is met with namecalling and shouts of racism, which is a hallmark of a mind that has nothing else to offer.

It's also divisive, but I wouldn't care about that if there was even a hit of evidence CRT is anything but another example of parochial narcissism.