Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawk
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You must be trolling.
In younger than 50, of the 8 deaths, 6 died who were unvaccinated, 2 died who were fully vaccinated..
In younger than 50, of the 80k infection cases, 50k were unvaccinated, 30k vaccinated. So unvaccinated have a higher infection rate, a much higher infection rate for unvaccinated in comparison to vaccinated, Especially when you consider unvaccinated make up 30% of UK pop while vaccinated around 70%
It gets worse for your case in the older than 50 as there aren't that many cases of unvaccinated that are infected because the unvaccinated are so few in that age group. Of the 1000 cases, 38 died. 3.8% death rate.
Keep in mind roughly 85%+ of UK >50 are vaccinated, if not more.. its pushing 95% in england.
Of the vaccinated over 50, 7500 infected, 70 died. 0.9% death rate.
|
You're proving my point. Young and healthy people don't need a vaccine. The death rate is less than 1%, even if unvaccinated.
You have to combine both 1 jab and 2 jabs and classify them as "vaccinated"
More people died that were vaccinated than non vaccinated
Even the MSM media is reporting it this way because the numbers don't lie. Sure, they are trying to claim that these numbers indicate a positive, but the percentages are concrete and the numbers are absolute.
From The Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/theobser...een-vaccinated
Quote:
|
It could sound worrying that the majority of people dying in England with the now-dominant Delta (B.1.617.2) variant have been vaccinated. Does this mean the vaccines are ineffective? Far from it, it’s what we would expect from an effective but imperfect vaccine, a risk profile that varies hugely by age and the way the vaccines have been rolled out.
|