Theory of everything

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who's seething? I just pointed out you're making shit up and you called me stupid in reply. You really should read up on some of that cognitive bias, fake explanation and Bayesian reasoning stuff. Your little pet hypothesis ticks all the boxes of being wrong and the biggest red flag of it is that it purports to explain everything.

A hypothesis that explains everything and prohibits nothing is a useless hypothesis because it offers no new information and no real explanation. It's akin to saying "God did it" or "It's magic" or it's an "Emergent Phenomenon". Those are not answers. Mystery is a property of questions and not answers. If you give an answer and the answer still feels mysterious and you gape in awe at the answer, you haven't really answered anything. If you have a real answer, there is no longer a mystery.

You can't use your hypothesis to make any new advance predictions. The basic test to see if your idea is right is to actually try to prove it wrong. If you can't see what the world would look like if it was wrong and come up with a test you can do to see if that world actually exists, then your hypothesis is useless.

Here's the Scientific Method they don't teach you in school:

Step 1: Make observations.
Step 2: Guess what's happening.
Step 3: Try to prove yourself wrong.

You stopped at step 2.

You propose the idiot's method of learning.

Taking infinite shots in the dark to arrive at success.

Time is backwards. You obtained success on the first shot, and all of your backwards learning are examples of how to miss

Energy and matter travel in reverse of time. That is why G=E