![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
This axiomatic nature is reflected in language itself. Things are defined by what they are, and what they are not, and those words are derived from theophilosophical concepts (which I suppose you could call "myth" as a synonymous umbrella term, but your ah-ha usage of "myth" as a tertiary position is illusory because myth describes both theology and philosophy, and has no meaning outside of that relationship)
| ||
|
Last edited by Gwaihir; 07-27-2021 at 09:38 PM..
| |||
|
|