End Times

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And if you have something against Chernobyl, then focus your energy at beurocracy because that is what caused that disaster, not the plant.

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...781-story.html
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/08/26/w...chernobyl.html

Yes, the choice was made in order to save money.

https://www.mydenveraccidentlawfirm....-of-the-pinto/

But again, according to the quote made by Andreev, no studies were conducted on Chernobyl by the industry.

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lastly, if you took ALL the damage nuke power has caused, and put it up against the BEST CASE SCENARIO for all other forms of power the damage to the environment is literally a puddle, next to an ocean. That is why you lack perspective. You are comparing fantasy to reality.

You're asking me to be afraid of movies and a lack of understanding.

I haven't asked anything other than how is taking into consideration other potential outcomes lacking perspective? There has been no attempt to appeal to anyone's emotions, other than through humor(an overlooked pun). No movies were referenced. Instead, cartoon clips were linked which seemed to help keep things in perspective except in your case because you have contributed precisely zero Simpsons links.

Chernobyl is still a reality, which I am comparing to other real events like the one in Fukushima. The only fantasy elements mentioned? Water dragonses. A missed opportunity on your part to speculate on custom content related to Bertoxxulous.

Also, the article about Onondaga Lake detailed the effect of mercury levels dating back to the 1940s, providing yet more perspective on the topic.