Arizona election audit finds massive fraud and irregularities

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let me know when you have evidence of where those ~74k mail ins that were counted came from? Let's stay on track, I know you have lots of questions. I'll check again tomorrow.

(Trump won, it was a blow out)

Page 21 of the thread…. “The claim, for instance, that 'we have 74,243 mail-in ballots where there is no clear record of them being sent' to people in the mail. As local ABC News politics and data analyst Garrett Archer almost immediately reported, the number cited to make this allegation was actually a combination of mail ballots and in-person early ballots, which of course would not have been sent to anyone in the mail.”

Don’t mean to make your head spin but there is another issue….

Folks who worry about dark money in politics like myself have been waiting with bated breath for the Supreme Court to decide Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta. The organization’s lawyers argued that California can’t find out the donors to secretive nonprofits like the Americans for Prosperity Foundation, which was founded by the Koch Brothers.

The the supreme Court ruled against the state and discounted its given reason for demanding donors’ names, which had to do with preventing fraud in charitable fundraising.
In American elections over the past decade, there has been a growing problem with dark money, which is spending in elections that cannot be traced to its original donor. Dark money becomes untraceable when it is syphoned through an opaque nonprofit like a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization or 501(c)(6) trade organization. Open Secrets estimated that there was nearly $1 billion in dark money in federal elections between 2010 and 2020, plus an additional $1 billion in undisclosed money spent in the 2020 election alone.
Some nonprofits have very complex structures, with a 501(c)(3) charitable arm, a 501(c)(4) social-welfare arm, and even a 527 purely political arm. Americans for Prosperity is a 501(c)(3) charity. So technically it is not allowed under IRS rules to intervene in any partisan election without risking its tax exempt status.
Meanwhile, California had a rule that all charities soliciting funds in the state need to confidentially report their donors to the attorney general’s office so that the state can root out potential charity fraud. California required this disclosure from Americans for Prosperity, which sued stating that the law violated its First Amendment rights.
the reality is that dark money already relies on opaque nonprofits to hide the identity of its true sources. Americans for Prosperity makes it easier for the ultra-wealthy to hide their role in bankrolling politically active charities.

Foreign entities as well?

yes, foreign entities. https://ballotpedia.org/501(c)(4) That would of course qualify as emoluments if proven and the NRA has gone down in part for that.

the real election fraud was in front of us the whole time...

I know.. I know… George Soros meme when blaming the Koch Brothers.