Enchanter OP impact poll

[azxten]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What are your thoughts on druid, shaman & necromancer charms.
Is it classic for druids to charm wolves in Kael?
Did necromancers run charasis back in the day?

And how about puppet strings, the recharge cost is too dang high.

Yes, it's all good except you had to actually risk channeling chance. Also as I've said over and over the main issue is lower levels where channeling chance was much lower than on P99. Way to miss the point though.

Same with the pet HP. It's primarily an issue with level 1-20ish when the pet is still being used. It plays into how Enchanters are able to easily solo with pet from 1-12 to charm when in reality 1-12 as an Enchanter on live was a horrible time and why most people gave up on the class.

People are just generally too stupid to understand the concept of how things work on a curve though. P99 Enchanter should be compared to charming wolves in Kael and no thought should be given to actual pre-Kunark era charm which is mainly what I'm discussing.

It's cool I'm putting together a larger narrative that addresses all the common fallacies used to dismiss the truth about Enchanter needing a nerf.

By the way, isn't it funny how people simultaneously are claiming that the Wiki makes everyone ultra powerful on P99 and that is why Enchanter is so OP but yet the Wiki is also completely wrong and all the data for Enchanter pets and should be ignored? Which one is it? Is the Wiki overpowered or is the Wiki wrong? If it's the former then pet data shows Enchanter's need a pet nerf. If it's the latter then it dismisses the argument that we now have infallible data to trivialize the game.

My pet max hit for 26 by the way, the max damage listed for a 24 pet with a max level of 23 which isn't a classic summonable pet level with the 24 spell. Thus why it's able to solo equivalent mobs and has too much HP.