I N D I C T E D

[DMN]

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wasn’t the quote about him after he was out of office? Or am I mistaken.

It was several months before his reelection in 2012.

Originally Posted by FatherSioux [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This sounds like the same argument as saying the POTUS can’t commit obstruction because of the position. Which I have to assume you don’t agree with.

It's irrelevant. The wording of the statute is unequivocal. It also does not specify there is any need for intent to exist, despite comey lying through his teeth.