Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaringChildren
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No, the majority of what they SEIZE is at ports of entry. The other data points are totally unknown.
I suppose they could take a boat, but honestly that's the more dangerous route for them and Coast Guard will most likely intercept them.
You're the one falling for false information, so I'm not the ignorant one here.
There's plenty of studies and data on modern walls in countries like Hungary and Israel, and they both succeed amazingly at what they're supposed to do. Sometimes cutting unlawful crossing by 90%.
But you don't want to read that data because it would hurt your perceptions [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
|
Those walls are heavily manned and designed to cover much smaller areas. I can't believe you are comparing walls in densely populated Israel to proposed territory that includes remote Texan desert. Walls also do nothing to address the millions of illegal immigrants who are already here. Cracking down on employers by enforcing our employment laws is
cheaper and
more effective than building a wall.
There is literally no reason to be against this other than because your mouth is firmly attached to Trump's anus and you regurgitate only what he shits into your mouth. That you haven't even addressed this idea is very telling.