![]() |
|
#32
|
||||
|
Quote:
This doesn't completely disqualify Rangers from their 'bad tank' reputation; it's not actually their mitigation which causes them problems; it is their lower avoidance (due to their paltry defence skill) and their lower Max hp. I.e a ranger isn't likely to be taking any more damage than any other melee on a per hit basis, the truth is they are just taking a larger number of hits and their low hp means each one of those hits represents a larger percentage of their health. This double drawback is what makes cheals so much more frequent compared to warriors/Knights/monks. A ranger isn't completely adrift without a shaman; indeed they can potentially self haste and have a few sources of slow. On top of this from 55+ they get chloroplast (and skin like nature if you are rocking with a necromancer as healer) for regen. All this said, at 60 a ranger can tank things like fungi king and Kael Arena so while they have their problems they are on the right side of adequate if no other tank is available. | |||
|
Last edited by Jimjam; 01-10-2019 at 07:21 PM..
|
|
|||
|
|