Why Harry Potter Should Have Carried A 1911

[loramin]

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And again, if it wasn't a legal process, then why did both parties swear under oath? For shits and giggles?

You're essentially saying that getting married is a more serious legal process than swearing in a Supreme Court Justice (of which there are only 9 in the US).

Please. For the love of God.

Stop being retarded.

Don't try and put words in my mouth: you're just grasping at straws, and kind of pathetically at that.

Look, you can't even meet your own definition:

Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement

Which aspect of the judicial system was involved with Kav's nomination and/or appointment? And no, swearing on a bible does not magically make something part of the judicial system (god, I feel stupid for even having to write that).