My Theory About Why Feminism is Currently Irrelevent to Millenials

[loramin]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

of course you do and that is part of the reason why I did not bother investing anymore in my last post than i did. this became evident in our last exchange :c had you any genuine
interest in propagating truth, or even understanding, you'd have worked with me in a focused discussion by answering my questions OR asking more of your own.

Instead, you want a source war. I'm sorry, but I don't know what information you need to make sense of my argument and I neither catalogue nor remember much of anything. I'm neither interested in nor capable of shoving piles of information back and forth. i do however possess an exceptional talent for discrimination and offered it for your use, but you just ignored it :c

People in this forum say a lot of crazy, if not flat out false things (I'm looking at you Mick [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]). Anyone can repeat whatever stupid thing someone they idolize (their favorite radio talk show host, tv news personality, blogger, etc.) says, no matter how false it may be. All I'm asking is that when people say things that sound crazy to me, that they somehow explain where that crazy belief is coming from, so that I can honestly consider whether they have a legitimate point or are just spouting baseless beliefs.

I'm not looking for an essay with footnotes for ten primary sources, I'm just saying if you (not you specifically, the general you) say all BLM protesters are violent psychopaths, I'm going to ask you to show me something that suggests that all BLM protesters are violent psychopaths. And if the thing you show me is some random guy's blog, or something not even related to the conversation (again, looking at you Mick), I'm going to call you out on it.

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you write a lot and have a lot of information ^^ I cannot address everything you say at once, nor am I interested in addressing every tangent you introduce when you ignore the substance of my argument :c

I respond to the stuff I disagree with, or the stuff I really strongly agree with. I'm not sure exactly what substance of what argument you are referring to (this thread is 20+ pages long), but most likely I just agreed with most of it and singled out one part because it (unlike the rest of what you wrote) seemed wrong to me.