![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What server you want | |||
| FFA pvp range 1-50 |
|
14 | 13.08% |
| FFA pvp range +-8 |
|
18 | 16.82% |
| FFA pvp range +-8 raid zones range 1-50 |
|
26 | 24.30% |
| Team based +-8 |
|
49 | 45.79% |
| Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
So if his likely goal is to start a popular server that further diversifies eqemu, it will (and should) probably go with Teams, even if that's not the preference of the pvp-tards who have swarmed the forums in the past few weeks (you guys are going to play on the server either way - don't kid yourselves). Teams are more appealing to people who don't organize into guilds right away and team up to mitigate class imbalances, so the "bluer" players as you would call them are less likely to ragequit after a few bad experiences. That being said, I think it's silly to lump everyone who is pro-Teams into some category of unskilled bluebie pussies just because you don't prefer that type of setup. I don't see what all the bitching is about, since a popular server is in everyone's best interest - if there's more population, that means that there will be more pvp encounters because there will be more victims from which to choose (and the zones will be more densely populated). wait.. why am I posting here?
__________________
Project 1999 (PvE):
Giegue Nessithurtsithurts, 60 Bard <Divinity> Starman Deluxe, 24 Enchanter Lardna Minch, 18 Warrior Project 1999 (PvP): [50 (sometimes 49) Bard] Wolfram Alpha (Half Elf) ZONE: oasis | |||
|
|
||||
|
|