How Blood Guard does Lodi

[Dreenk317]

Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

After skimming through the first few pages of this thread, I'm going to have to side with the AG folks. That was a real scummy move BG. This appears to be one of those cases where you're not technically in the wrong, but still acted like a bunch of assholes. Will definitely remember this is how BG rolls when I encounter your members since the guild appears to support this sort of stuff.

BG attacked a mob, got KS'ed, and petitioned. Something that AG does on the regular.
Sirken answered with a "no loot for anyone ruling", commpletely fair for both parties involved instead of potential bans/whatever, in my opinion. Both parties acted sketchy, both parties got denied loot.

thats all that happened here untill OP brought it to RNF, trashing an entire guild for the actions of 3 of its members, then BG showed up to shine a light on his bullshit. Even the original BG member that has admitted to being there admits it was a dickish move. I think what were all waiting for is OP to admit that hes already admitted to KS'ing intentionally, and that that was also a dickish move, especially when hes claimed, multiple times, to not even have needed the gnoll pet.