Quote:
Originally Posted by eadric
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Climate Change "scientists" are the new priest class. They are only interested in protecting their status within the new priesthood, not with scientific facts. The mathematical manipulations used to exaggerate the impact of CO2 on global temperature have been proven by the few courageous enough to speak the truth.
Unfortunately, most people aren't intelligent enough to analyze the math for themselves, or even to follow as someone else points out the manipulation and errors. They just trust the priests to do their thinking for them. Here's Christopher Monckton's presentation, with an easy to follow analysis of exactly where the priests manipulated the formula. http://www.deluxetech.co.uk/wp-conte...sensi-cm16.pdf
|
Yeah say that to Venus, not too much CO2 there eh? If not for climate change, clean energy should be used to decrease pollution which will also decrease the need for additional health care cost. I mean really, the rain forest are depleting and our consuming of fossil fuels is increasing as our population increases.
And I know 98% of scientist agree that climate change is a fact, I've seen plenty of evidence and studies along the way. The climate has been studied for many decades now showing an increase in temperature slowly as the years go by with coordination to CO2 being represented as a variable.
It is not about grants although very needed to keep the scientist able to monitor climate change.
Vice News had really great coverage of how it's being studied, and the findings . Also how oil lobbist are involved with promoting it as a hoax. I ask you why would only oil companies fund those deniers, plenty of independent scientist of a conservative background found climate change to be fact.