Quote:
Originally Posted by big_ole_jpn
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"safety lights are for dudes". sure, liking Ghostbusters: Class Struggle Edition is being blind to gender.
Never said an all-female cast is a fundamental problem. The problem is that the director and producers were clearly using gender politics for a marketing angle instead of worrying about making a decent movie. You can accuse me of being a sexist for not deliberately lobotomizing myself and ignoring the obvious because you heard on TV that it's more important to virtue signal about being "gender blind" than to be a functional human if you want.
How insulting it is to the audience to assume they are more concerned with dogshit Marxist politics than seeing a decent film when they go to purchase a ticket. But hey, that's how stupid these fucks believe the mass of humanity is. That is how much contempt they have for human life.
The failure of this movie is actually a pretty damn good sign. Indicates that the reach of gender d&c brainwashing is significantly weaker than estimated by the (((executives))) at Sony -- executives that are intimately plugged in to deeper talmudic concerns, if you recall the email leak. Chink in the armor.
|
It was rather cynical of the execs to attempt that kind of marketing scheme, and the market might be an indicator that what is rampant on the internet or voiced by a younger generation isn't where the mean of society actually is. Whether or not such plans will continue has yet to be seen and doubtful because of the data that Ghostbusters has provided. I also think that Melissa McCarthy's run is up becuase she's the same character and somehow was given the John Candy career path when she has way less talent.