Shaft, is it? Cruz has a lot to say about shafts.
Slimey Ted argued against Constitutionality of dildos, masturbation.
Quote:
Back in 2004, Ted Cruz's solicitor general office fought to defend a ruling in Texas that found selling sex toys was not protected by the Constitution. In his brief, Cruz's office defended the obscenity law by saying that "any alleged right associated with obscene devices" is not "deeply rooted in the nation's history and traditions."
Then came the real whammy. The brief went even further, asserting that, "There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one's genitals for non-medical purposes unrelated to procreation or outside of an interpersonal relationship." In other words, as Mother Jones explains, Cruz effectively argued that "the pursuit of such happiness had no constitutional standing."
|
Despite such a strong Christian stance, his former roommate easily refutes Ted's self-professed piety. Lyin' Ted lies again. Sad!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]