![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What is your opinion of the No Boxing Rule? | |||
| I think its important to this server's health, and should stay. |
|
220 | 74.58% |
| I think it should be removed. |
|
58 | 19.66% |
| It wouldn't affect me either way. |
|
17 | 5.76% |
| Voters: 295. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
I'll make this easy.
No Boxing is not classic. Sony did not have a IP exemption or a no 2 accounts rule. So everyone's arguments are pretty null and void [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] No boxing is great for this emu environment, but there seems to be a lot of 100% hardcore attempts at this "RAWR 100% CLASSIC STUFFZ" No boxing is NOT classic, sure things were different back then but I WAS one of the few that had multiple accounts back in 99-00 because I had many friends that 2 boxed with me as well. Edit: I honestly don't give a piss on the boxing rule right now, I enjoy it because playing 2-3 accounts/chars is tedious as fuck. I wanted to simply state the fact that its "dur hur not even close to classic to have a restriction on accounts" but then again this is a FREE environment vs a subscription environment But why stop there right? I'm sure there are other things we should change because is a EMU VS LIVE Classic Vs 100% Classic. Why stop with limiting the amount of accounts? | ||
|
Last edited by Recyclebin; 02-17-2010 at 04:40 PM..
|
|
||
|
|