Quote:
Originally Posted by Triangle
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure Orruar was the raid leader of Triality way back in Classic EQ...
|
Yes and guild leader. Damn good at it, and probably best player I've seen in the game. Different era's though, Triality didn't really form until PoP. He has some experience from our time together in A-Team on P99, including as raid leader, but not really sure of his grasp on the current dynamics behind Class C and the new FFA Class R (and Class R is going to end up worse petition-wise than C in short order).
Orr - if you want to discuss it with me sometime toss me an email or login.
Also, if anyone thinks that the # of bans has anything to do with the # of infractions and rule breaks they're sadly mistaken. All sort of things happen, from negotiations in advance, to some stuff being tossed aside for lack of evidence, stuff being combined, stuff being seperated, etc. One thing P99 is bad at is setting any sort of rule precidents - it's all subject to change. You can govern on a GM side 2 ways - from a judicial approach with precedents and standard punishments, or from an Arbiter perspective, with things changing based on each situation, variables unknown to anyone except maybe petitioning guilds, and various dynamics. Sirken tends to use the latter, not the former. This proposal might work in the former, but does not work in the latter. For better or worse P99 uses an arbiter setup instead of a judicial setup.
03-11-2015, 03:38 AM
Threaded Mode