Quote:
Originally Posted by paulgiamatti
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's fair, that's all I ask really. I'm not claiming to know the answers here, I've just decided to make up my own mind about it. I've spent so many hours scrutinizing building 7, and at the end of the day I'm just not willing to say that enough thermite explosives could have been planted on the structural beams of the building to bring it down without anyone knowing about it. At the end of the day I'm just not willing to believe on a dime that it was demolished, or "pulled", just because some lease holder in a business suit said that might have happened, or because fucking Ron Paul says the government is being dishonest.
Ah, I'm glad someone caught this. It is an appropriation of something one of my heroes Christopher Hitchens said, who was very much influenced by Dawkins, so I'll only give you partial credit.
|
If you disagree that Building 7 was brought down with explosives then you disagree with the laws of physics. It's as simple as that. In order for an object to fall at the speed of gravity there must be zero resistance. This is in fact the case with building 7 and the twin towers. They fell at the speed of gravity which means all support was cut out simultaneously. Even just comparing it to videos of actual demolitions the similarities are painfully obvious.
Oh and people did state that in the months preceding 9/11, there was construction going on inside the building and when people went to the floors that work was supposedly being done on, they found nothing. Very strange.
Sorry but the fact is our government has been infiltrated and taken over by people who hate us and want to kill and control us. It's a hard truth to swallow but part of the reason why they are able to get away with this shit is because people refuse to accept the truth of their reality.