Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old 07-31-2014, 03:11 AM
Rais Rais is offline
Fire Giant

Rais's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 743
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Using precedent? Hilarious idea. As if cases are handled with any kind of consistency or logic on this server. We ask for the server rules to be written down, for GMs to keep punishments consistent, just completely basic things that will never happen.

IB trains Nexona on us and we lose 1 nexona, we apparently (for the sake of argument) train Hosh on IB and we lose an entire week of VP, plus we had all our loot from our four legitimate kills deleted. So we essentially lose two weeks of VP. Where was it written that we'd lose our loot for mobs that we killed while off suspension? It isn't in the post that lists the conditions of our temporary un-suspension. Can you see what I'm getting at? All we want is consistency and for precedent to mean something. Really. It would make things 1000x easier.
You don't have to type it like I am saying the opposite. I agree with you and even stated numerous times what the issues are since the very first post I've made. I felt that way on staff and I felt that as a player before and after Amelinda. I even stated a petition that was handled that was pretty much the same case, and it was ruled in favor of TMO. So it isn't like I am fighting you on this.

I am only stating sometimes the stars align and decisions match those of the past. When players get upset is when decisions don't correspond to past issues. This has always been an issue and will con-tune to be an issue.


Quote:
No one is spinning you simply aren't understanding what people are typing to you in plain english. The aggro to zone in was off IB's secondary aggro where a cleric healed a bard. Whether our train up guy died or not doesn't matter. Once the cleric healed the bard in that group Hoshkar was coming to zone in.
No you don't get it. If it wasn't for your Hosh train, this may very well never had happened. Between what the gms can look at, and what your own guild member stated, it was most likely the cause of Hoku of gaining agro on Hosh. It's the only thing that matters. IB didn't train themselves, TMO caused Hoku to gain agro from a failed train/pull. That's it. It's the price of training shit around.
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.