Quote:
Originally Posted by hivemind
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
When we talk about Nihilum being the dominant guild now, we are not speaking in subjective terms. When you make references about changes implemented over a "long period" that weakened "Nihilum's strangle hold on the server's raid mobs" realize that there is a connotation that not only has Nihilum been the dominant guild historically (ie they have had a lack of competitors and competition), but that Nihilum has been "strangling" the server because they are so dominant. That is subjective (as all connotations are), but those are your words not mine.
|
How is this long-winded nothing of a sentence even relevant? Are you arguing the semantics of what is objective and what is subjective? Who gives a shit.
This is a thread about variance, not your intellectual playground. Get fuckin' real, bro.
The reasons GMs implemented changes in the past may not have been rooted in the idea that Nihilum needs more of a challenge, but what I said was that they were changes championed by, specifically, players in the opposing guilds who could no longer compete (i.e. people wanted more of a chance to take things from Nihilum). And this lack of competition absolutely is for lack of trying. The first step to competing is being not lazy.