ninja looting or no?

[Laugher]

[insert red plug-use of the terms other server toxic, camps are free, xp bonus]

I don't ever rule lawyer but I think it may be worthwhile to mention here this snippet from the stickied PnP at the top of these forums.

I am not a member of BDA, but this argument seems redundant given the PnP and the ruling Derubael made. Allow me to elaborate.

To nail this point into the ground further:

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Note: A "group" in this case is defined as a party of one or more characters that are united in a common belief or goal and are capable of completing that goal.

Project 1999 Staff will not be defining what constitutes a camp. Instead, Project 1999 Customer Service Staff will arbitrate spawn disputes on a per-case-basis. We greatly encourage players to find their own resolution to spawn disputes, as the solution provided by the staff will at best be a win-lose situation, and possbily a lose-lose situation. No two decisions, even at the same 'camp', are guaranteed to be the same, as we will take into account multiple factors in making a determination on a 'camp'.

That being said, you can absolutely "camp" mobs, and you cannot steal another players 'camp'.

other ench didn't have a group there before BDA was my understanding, could not take the spawn by themselves, therefore when BDA showed up and could take it before other ench's group.. it became their camp then. By this ruling they were the group camping the mob.

by CSR intervention the deletion of the items from said ench should tell you that BDA was found in the right and ninja looting (at least in this situation by an unintended recipient of the loot ) was found to be in the wrong by CSR.

Am I missing something here? Was the other group there, was this ench able to solo a level 60 Verina Tomb?

*edit* woops wrong thread.. as for AC that is certainly a case-by-case scenario haha.