Lock Server Until an Agreement is Met

[Fountree]

Originally Posted by derpcake [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One day they would perhaps also like to "join the uberguild", but I guess that is no concern of yours, and its best if they piss off now being the pansies they are.

/shrug. I think you are a fine example of why guilds like Assent, and longer Term Triality failed. Zero long term vision, alienating others, thereby killing the community and not recruiting what remains.

Again, you are on P99, not on EQlive. More I need not say.

TMO was harshly punished first of all, (GMs issuing temp bans those who did not do anything wrong, issuing a long raid suspension for raid violations that resulted in much shorter and less harsh suspensions for other guilds in the same situation in the past)

But we're used to it.

TMO is a juggernaut and needed to be weakened, otherwise we would have killed 500 traks. Our system works, our players are dedicated + determined. People really enjoy saying how it required no skill , and yes once we made it to the top things and Kunark became longer and longer (gear got better) it became more going-through-the-motions for sure, but the time and effort put in to tracking, batphoning, leveling alts to camp at more targets...how can you say all that success was undeserved, or bad leadership? lol. Wouldn't you do the same if your system was working?

If anything, we should have rotated with FE/IB on trak/vs/ct once we knew they were capable and opened up talks for a VP rotation while we had the chance. I'm not a fan of the iron grip mentality and I understand we need to let and even help others have a chance at raid mobs. Why didn't we take a week off from time to time? Why didn't we let FE attempt Hoshkar for fun? I can't say because I wasn't in a position to make those calls. There were certainly bad decisions made but that's just my opinion in retrospect now that all this crap as gone down - as a non-leader/officer.