Quote:
Originally Posted by baalzy
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I've seen you state this multiple times, is there any evidence that these people were suspended because the guilty parties had logged on to their accounts at 'some point' or were the suspensions handed to people whose accounts had been used at some point *after* the exploiting occurred?
The second case seems much more likely and constantly stating the first point as fact makes you sound like a whiny brat with a victim complex.
But maybe that's just me.
|
If the offender IPs were
ever logged in to your account, you were at the very least suspended. If there was duping associated with that account, it was perma banned.
One of my accounts that I lent out when on hiatus was flagged because I had shared info with a friend and that person shared it with an offender. I didn't even know he had been on the account until after the fact. Shit happens.