![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
Conceptually, it's all very simple: If you refuse to believe life or the universe could not arise by itself, and choose instead to believe it was the work of a creator, you must ask yourself: Then who created the creator? If your answer is: The creator created himself, or that he always existed, then why not skip a step and say the universe created itself, or the universe always existed? Are they not equally absurd, or equally sensible? How can you try to use one to discredit the other? The meaningful difference is, people don't generally make claims about a non-creator origin of the universe without evidence, and they are willing to rethink their theories in light of new evidence. All you've got supporting your claim is a legacy of dipshit mythology, poor logic, and a criminal misunderstanding of the scientific method. | |||
|
|
||||
|
|