![]() |
|
#9
|
|||||
|
Quote:
(1) See poker vs lottery example. Some RNG does not equal pure RNG. Poker does not equal lottery. (2) You assume pure RNG is the only way to 'fairly distribute' the manastone and thus your pure RNG must be correct. Effectively, you're saying: "Your idea is based on the same premise as mine. And since my standard of fairness is the right one, my idea must be correct." Wrong. Quote:
To those who go long....no one is staying up for a week. People are banding together with friends to camp an item, and taking turns camping it. Sounds pretty EQ to me. Kind of like getting your epic. I'd even call it an "asynchronous epic camp" since it's friends camping the item in succession. Your argument is pretty flaccid: " Fellas.... it's INSANITY or my way (whcih BTW I am going to tell you, is just so very reasonable, so good, I'm just going to describe it as "open it up to everyone who wants to play the game"). Lastly, your Bernie Bro socialist approach is one of the worst ideas to 'fix' list. I'm not going to ping pong the idea back and forth with you on this. It will never happen because it is so antithetical to the spirit of EQ. It cheapens the goal (manastone) by requiring nothing more than dumb luck. No feeling of ownership, no feeling of accomplishment -- it's socialism. I'll let you argue it out with others. I've made my points -- they can stand on their own merits, and I'll bet 50K, your approach is never implemented for Manastone on Green.
__________________
| ||||
|
Last edited by Castle2.0; 04-07-2020 at 03:54 PM..
|
|
||||
|
|