rape jokes

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I find it hilarious; you don't. Furthering my point, that you won't approach, that funny is subjective.

Sorry, but that's offensive isn't a fucking argument in any situation.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[kenzar]

why you balkin' bro?

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the problem is that they are made to further the status quo of the power dynamic, not to be funny.

that really depends on the joke and the comedian

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I find it hilarious; you don't. Furthering my point, that you won't approach, that funny is subjective.

Sorry, but that's offensive isn't a fucking argument in any situation.

That's what his entire argument boils down to though. Remember he said that he felt the woman in his video won the argument, her entire argument boiled down to "you're a dick for saying it". What's comedy again? Dur.

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

your argument is fluctuating between negligence and liability. is a person who drinks in excess and passes out generally negligent? yes. is that negligence liable for a rape? most certainly not

Let's modify the situation to something less emotionally invoking and see if your stance remains unchanged.
Girl gets wasted while barhopping downtown and walks by a hustler running a shells scam which she'd usually avoid but while having her judgement impaired she decides to play and play and play and loses all of her money. By your logic, she's 0% at fault/liable for her loss?

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by kenzar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why you balkin' bro?

I've already communicated clearly to you. Go back and read.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's modify the situation to something less emotionally invoking and see if your stance remains unchanged.
Girl gets wasted while barhopping downtown and walks by a hustler running a shells scam which she'd usually avoid but while having her judgement impaired she decides to play and play and play and loses all of her money. By your logic, she's 0% at fault/liable for her loss?

This is the stupidest shit I've heard since Visage.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's modify the situation to something less emotionally invoking and see if your stance remains unchanged.
Girl gets wasted while barhopping downtown and walks by a hustler running a shells scam which she'd usually avoid but while having her judgement impaired she decides to play and play and play and loses all of her money. By your logic, she's 0% at fault/liable for her loss?

you cannot be serious

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is the stupidest shit I've heard since Visage.

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you cannot be serious

Double ad-hominem. Double concede.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Double ad-hominem. Double concede.

You're right. You win. Good job.

[Hasbinbad]

This thread is much better now:
http://www.project1999.org/forums/pr...ignore&u=28252

Also works on other threads.