Nocturne

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Nocturne [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sciences own theories and laws are the best evidence against scientific hypothesis. Explain how cell theory and abiogenesis can co-exist. Cell theory states all cells come from pre-existing cells. Every single one. No exceptions. Abiogenesis assumes that cells can in fact come into existence without the need for a previously existing cell of that type. Abiogenesis however is just a hypothesis. Cell theory is an actual theory completely accepted by the entire scientific community.

According to you a theory is supposedly the highest achievement of scientific knowledge. Why then do you assume that some day the hypothesis of abiogenesis will some day be proven when there is a scientific theory that has never once been seen to be even so much as remotely not true. A theory which literally says that what this hypothesis is asserting is an impossibility according to every single ounce of knowledge we possess on the subject.

Sounds to me like desperation. Desperate to believe in anything other than what the evidence is blatantly telling us. According to cell theory, no cells should even exist at all. At one point no cells existed but they all have to come from one another and even then, they can only be the exact type of cell that they were produced from. This defies possibility. How can a scientific theory that literally contradicts itself even exist? The evidence is overwhelming is why. The important part of this theory is that it proves an "impossible" event occurred at one point in history. The "impossible" event of course being the creation of the first cell. The only logical explanation for an impossible event occurring that shows clear characteristics of intelligent involvement, would be God.

But of course, it can't be God, he doesn't exist! Anything but God!! How bout soup! Primordial soup! Everyone likes soup!!! Impossible things can just randomly occur on their own for no actual reason!

Completely unable to follow even the most basic instructions... no wonder you wallow in perpetual ignorance.
Thread has your name on it and I'm not even paying attention to your posts any more.

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thread has your name on it and I'm not even paying attention to your posts any more.

[Hasbinbad]

Thread confirmed more famous / popular than its namesake.

[Hitchens]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also I consider them to be very cultish.

Jeez, is it really that big of a deal that I didn't accept your friendship request?

[Hasbinbad]

Originally Posted by Hitchens [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Jeez, is it really that big of a deal that I didn't accept your friendship request?

lol

[Hitchens]

Supposedly the Reddit atheism forum has all of the terrible characteristics that people associate with atheists.

[Hasbinbad]

I think you can't get more eloquent than Hitchens or Dawkins on the question of atheism, and even Dawkins is a self-admitted agnostic de facto, no matter how much they try to change the definitions of words.

I haven't heard anyone make a cogent argument on the subject that didn't originate with the thinking of these men, and they usually ignore tidbits like "god is just as likely as fairies"-dawkins in their cultish certainty and parroted positions.

[Black Jesus]

no even hitchens and dawkins are total fucking fart sniffin idiots

[Black Jesus]

Originally Posted by reddit

Saudi Arabia is working to reverse decades of favoring religious over scientific studies in schools and universities. The country is pouring billions into improving science curricula, endowing new research-oriented universities and establishing scientific agencies.

not sure replacing 1 set of crackpot theories for another is gonna do them any good

[Hitchens]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think you can't get more eloquent than Hitchens or Dawkins on the question of atheism, and even Dawkins is a self-admitted agnostic de facto, no matter how much they try to change the definitions of words.

I haven't heard anyone make a cogent argument on the subject that didn't originate with the thinking of these men, and they usually ignore tidbits like "god is just as likely as fairies"-dawkins in their cultish certainty and parroted positions.

I dunno about any of that, I just know they write good books.