FE knowingly KS's TMO's Trak, Rushes to complete keys and Epics

[Zeelot]

It should match fine, as all my logs in the past have matched up as well with the server logs. You guys are really off the deep-end thinking I would do anything to the logs.

[maverixdamighty]

Originally Posted by Zeelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He wasn't DA'd or there would've been a cast message from the clickie. Not just my logs but all logs I've seen, which have cast messages of people in the area. Your boy never cast DA.

And if you want me to prove it to you with another mechanic test I can, if we were both DA, Trakanon would have still prioritized Option.

he da'd before you were even in lair is how it sounded like in vent. he made it sound like he was first person on trak period.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The problem is your logs seem to be missing quite a lot of information like this.

1. Merkk never hit.
2. Merkk never dies.
3. Option never FD.
4. Trakanon spell never finalizes (he casts; doesnt say who / what resisted or was hit).
etc....

Certainly, Merkk and Option's logs will prove you right. Right?

[Tanthallas]

Originally Posted by Zeelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It should match fine, as all my logs in the past have matched up as well with the server logs. You guys are really off the deep-end thinking I would do anything to the logs.

You can say this all you want.

Do I need to post the proof that this is not true again, or can you go back a few pages and find it?

[Loke]

Originally Posted by Kinsawt [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No bullshit, I could 100% get this loot awarded to IB. 100%.

Kins #1 rule lawyer of p99. Out lawyers actual lawyers. Confirmed by Rogean.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can say this all you want.

Do I need to post the conjecturethat this is not true again, or can you go back a few pages and find it?

ftfy

[47shadesofgay]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1. Option appeared 2 times. Option also has a recorded 538 damage on his first encounter list. The story claims that Option Javelin'd, you stood up, then Option FD'd. This is clearly not true. Option went in and whirl-winded. He did not FD until well after FE had engaged, as that is exactly what he was waiting for....

Why can nobody prove this? We know what the GMs have ruled, so option posting his logs, or somebody posting fraps should be the easiest fucking thing in the world to over-turn something like this.

Are people really not running/fraps/enabling logs on raiding? If that's the case then I guess people deserve to lose mobs.

That is how loot is decided, even with all of Zeelot's inconsistencies, SOME measure of proof must be put forth by the claiment in order to reverse a decision I would think.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by 47shadesofgay [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why can nobody prove this? We know what the GMs have ruled, so option posting his logs, or somebody posting fraps should be the easiest fucking thing in the world to over-turn something like this.

Are people really not running/fraps/enabling logs on raiding? If that's the case then I guess people deserve to lose mobs.

That is how loot is decided, even with all of Zeelot's inconsistencies, SOME measure of proof must be put forth by the claiment in order to reverse a decision I would think.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Servellious]

WASHER SET TO SPIN

[47shadesofgay]

Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kins #1 rule lawyer of p99. Out lawyers actual lawyers. Confirmed by Rogean.

Kinsawt confirmed wore suit/tux while raiding.