|  | 
| 
			 
			#1  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |  Quick question Can a Shaman make a viable healer for a group at 60? does he have enough healing spells to do so? | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#2  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   Yes, but it's not going to be as efficient as if there was a cleric present, so a lot of the community wouldn't recommend it. I definitely prefer having a cleric in the group, and I am all about weird group compositions. 96 Rez is a crutch that there's just very little reason to do without. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#3  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   At level 60 a Shaman who has his spells (specifically Torpor) will heal sufficiently in almost any situation.  Torpor plus Regrowth plus Cannibalize means the Shaman can go longer than a Cleric can before running out of mana.  The Shaman also brings tools such as slow and malo which someone else has to provide if you have a Cleric. Of course Torpor is a very expensive level 60 spell which not all Shamans have. Complete heal costs a few plat from a vendor at level 39. You can be sure the Cleric will have his most important healing tools while you'll have to ask a Shaman in advance. Danth | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#4  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   yup as the previous poster said if you have torpor a shaman can be preferable in some situations.  not only can they slow the mobs they can haste/buff the melees and also jbb nuke if they have one etc and epic dot etc. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#5  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   shamans are the preferred healer in most melee / healer duo's however in a full group / raid situation it is hard to beat a clerics cheal 
				__________________ | ||
|  | |||
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |