Veeshan's Peak - Non disputable zone

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Zeelot [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

NPCs in hate do not AOE and they path much better. Like I have been saying, the main problem with a rule situation in there = AOEs.

Take this hypothetical - I go into PD room to pull, a monk in another guild is watching me and also ready to pull. Meanwhile not watching the see invis ae wurm about to path into him from behind. Just as I am about to pull it aggros him, ae fears, and kills us both.

If VP has rules then the monk in question should get suspended for killing me and not being aware.

If thats how you want it to be!

psh, everyone loves to get wurms thru walls!

[Fountree]

Chest, your guild is a disgrace. I'm out of this thread :P

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just want the traditional rules of the server to extend to VP, no tears here. I feel that may other guilds besides BDA and FE would benefit from this as well.

I would love to see the mass crying after 3 guilds stepped into VP and tried to pull a dragon or 2.

Originally Posted by Fountree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Chest, your guild is a disgrace. I'm out of this thread :P

please. stop. posting.

[arsenalpow]

Yes, I'd like accountability in VP. If one of my monks (or me!) did something stupid like fire off an AE and kill an opposing guild puller I'd be inclined to concede the mob at that point, but that's how I operate.

[Fountree]

Why? move this trash to RnF. And I'd say to you: Please. Start. Playing. We could use an active necro who cared about the end-game.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Fountree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why? move this trash to RnF. And I'd say to you: Please. Start. Playing. We could use an active necro who cared about the end-game.

B/c you're gonna get forum banned and you tend to get carried away lol.

Also, I was going to but my account holder hasn't responded to me lately [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Fountree]

The only people getting carried away are the people who constantly post garbage like this to the server chat. They know what direction it's going to go in. I'm just responding in earnest...

[Joroz]

Non CSR rule is to save guide resources from constantly saving stupid people that zoned in without support/raid. It wasn't to create an open pvp type battle field. Sooner or later this server will come to terms that its rules need to be tailored to what works best with a volunteer staff instead of hugging onto what was perceived as rules of the era.

[falkun]

This is a valid discussion about server topics. The only reason its going towards RNF is because of posters like you adding nothing but whining. Even Zeelot adds constructively to this debate without whining. If you have nothing to say, do as you stated and get "out of this thread".

If you think BDA is a disgrace, there are plenty of RNF posts for you to debase us.

EDIT: Joroz, there is bro love here.

[Fountree]

Originally Posted by falkun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO was grandfathered in to VP, but the other forces do not have that luxury. TMO was given a two week period of non-contested VP loot, and competing forces were not allowed to train them, so they could set up their CoH locations and also pre-camp any forces for training or recovery purposes. I'm sure FE, BDA, or VD (when it existed) would trade 48 hours of no outside raid mobs for the protection inside VP that was granted to IB and TMO when VP was first opened.

Yes Falkun, this was a serious discussion about CSR in VP and not about how TMO gets unfair advantages. Sorry to derail this enlightening and objective discussion