If pvp exp was increased, what % and why?

[Silentone]

I went with 50% as to not seem to unrealistic, but seeing how there is a large pop who wants 100% ..i change my vote to 100%....im guessing as one of the people who didnt vote 100% ..there are more like me who would change their vote if allowed.

[Ssleeve]

25% ~ Fuck other people, they are dumb.

Same reason why democracy doesn't work.

[steakshop]

bluecross you will change your mind when you get higher level and see how little xp stuff gives trust me

[Arillious]

Vast majority want a change of some kind.

If it brings back 20% of the people who are saying "Exp rate is the reason i quit" then its worth it.

We all know that putting in a exp bonus is pretty simple.(Temp bonus's are done all the time)

Whats the hold up? Unless this slow decline is turned around soon, even the die hards are going to quit.

On a side, I think adding an additional "group exp" bonus is a good idea. Over 70% of the server is one of 6 classes: Druid, shaman, necro, bard, mage, wizard. If someone is trying to level as efficiently as possible, none of these classes should ever be grouping after a certain level(When shamans get pet, when wizards can quad, etc) as any of the other classes are just going to slow them down.

[kprobe]

rogeans scale sounds decent, I would make the overall bonus skewed even more to the low end IMHO something like 500/(x^(0.8)+5), where x is your level, or a smooth cosine curve like 50(1+cos(0.0625x)), but simple is probably best.

[Harrison]

This kid banned for exploiting.

Originally Posted by steakshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

stasis speaks the truth , wise words

hey level 13 gtfo like i said , come back when youve put in some time

[Lulz Sect]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Amuk]

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This kid banned for exploiting.

This guy doesn't even play this game - weird.

[Rutaq]

Originally Posted by Amuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The servers boring, there was less than 100 on Saturday at peak time. I was here day opening and have seen people drop off like flies. When I say it blows my mind that a level 13 is talking it's because I mean you haven't gone through any kind of difficulty yet. You have played in Qeynos and Blackburrow - come talk to me in a couple months. We still have a guild mate monk who's lvl 40 who logs on every day see's noone online and logs. You really don't know shit and are comming here arguing against making a change which could help the population - and it pisses me off. I don't go post on how to suck a dick threads and try to fuck your hobby up.

I feel sorry for your 40th level Monk friend.

The assumption that a drastic increase in the XP is going to "fix" EQ classic is unproven and pushing people quickly to 50 with such a limited amount of PvP content will bring about it's own set of problems.

Sucking dick aside, your opinion is as valid as anyone elses.

[Mittens Romney]

Originally Posted by Rutaq [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I feel sorry for your 40th level Monk friend.

The assumption that a drastic increase in the XP is going to "fix" EQ classic is unproven and pushing people quickly to 50 with such a limited amount of PvP content will bring about it's own set of problems.

Sucking dick aside, your opinion is as valid as anyone elses.

Please name a few of the problems in this "set of problems"
At lvl 30 I have been attacked only one time. Pushing exp to bring everyone to the same lvl is the ONLY solution to a low population server. Once everyone gets the grind out of the way, most people camp resist gear and pvp. This is what creates pvp and entertainment on the red server. Not mindlessly chipping away at 50 lvls in some armpit of a zone that maybe gets 3 people to it max a day.