Epic Camp Handoffs

[Kassel]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol @ a line to Pickpocket. You're ROGUES, THIEVES, SWASHBUCKLERS... what a bunch of candy asses.

Absolutely nothing wrong with pickpocketing "someone else's" merb imo.

ppl have been suspended for pick pocketing SF's before. Not saying its identical here, most rogues i have talked to have been willing to form a gentlemen's agreement and let the first person there go first. I would not expect tmo to understand this but i have been LoLing at all the tmo corpses around the rogue GM's.

[Motec]

And that attitude is what hurts everyone. But because it exists, things will continue the way they are

[Cyrano]

Stealing who is that bomb ass bitch in your sig? Soda said he wants to smash.

[ElanoraBryght]

Re Pawdutser : there's been a single monk on that camp for 27 hours.
It hasn't been handed off at all. Unless it spawned before Bisch got there, it hasn't spawned at all.

Poll away if it's a hypothetical. But in this particular named by mob example, it does not apply.

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i'm not trying to water down the experience, just make it fair for someone who isn't in the major guilds to get an epic piece

Hypothetically, I don't think I should have to wait in line behind every single TMO/IB/VD monk for my crack at pawbuster, which is most likely the case, the current guild will continue passing the camp until they don't have anyone that needs it; and this type of situation applies to NUMEROUS camps.

It's just a thought.

[Colberg]

For the record....its the same monk there have spend the time from patch and until now at the camp in KC

[arsenalpow]

ya, pawbuster was just an example. Being a monk it was the first bottle neck that i could think of

the mistmoore shaman thing is another one

[Rais]

For the sake of Bisch being cool. I've been doing it as first in, first out. Of course people don't have to listen to me. But I've had random non guilded monks in line, along with TMO bards showing to loot warlord heads.

Trust me, I'd rather this fuck spawn so I can move on. But also keep in mind, a monk can't solo this camp. I'm 100% sure I've provided the healers/buffers/CCers so people can get exp, WHILE I am ouside the group helping.

So you're bitching holds no value.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Rais [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So your bitching holds no value.

again this isn't bitching, it's hypothetical.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Kassel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ppl have been suspended for pick pocketing SF's before. Not saying its identical here, most rogues i have talked to have been willing to form a gentlemen's agreement and let the first person there go first. I would not expect tmo to understand this but i have been LoLing at all the tmo corpses around the rogue GM's.

There has also been people not suspended for PP'n seafuries. No honor among thieves imo.

TMO corpses is also lol, I'm sure a few have died to the GM rogue no? I think Shiftin can testify.

Edit:

Originally Posted by Motec [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And that attitude is what hurts everyone. But because it exists, things will continue the way they are

Didn't I help you get AJ over my own guild members? After I even got the FTE and the kill on it?

Hilarious you talk about "that attitude". If I had that "attitude" toward every thing with everyone, you'd of had to wait and rage some more.

They are rogues, they shouldn't need a line to FTP on a mob. Want to form a happy friendly agreement with other rogues, go ahead, but i wouldn't expect one to show up and be all happy go lucky about 10 flower huggin "rouges" standing around with their thumbs up their asses.

[Dfn]

Merge servers. Enable PvP.

Camp problems - solved.
Botters - solved.