Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 11-08-2011, 12:58 PM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pickled_heretic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]


now for some unmoderated flame by samoht, in this thread:
It's up to you to report it when you feel like you have been personally attacked in server chat. If you felt slighted by his statements then you need to report it. I am not here to read every single thing that everybody writes in every single subforum. I respond to petitions.

The fact that server chat is not the place to get off topic by attacking people does not change.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
  #132  
Old 11-08-2011, 12:58 PM
guineapig guineapig is offline
Planar Protector

guineapig's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,028
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Problem is the hoop should be hurt not necros, sks and life tap proc weapons. I'm legit trying'ta be positive here.
I do not disagree with this.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Server chat is for civil conversation. Personal attacks/generally being confrontational will not be tolerated.
  #133  
Old 11-08-2011, 01:00 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

I think its also up to your discretion to have a thicker skin when engaging in internet arguments :P.
  #134  
Old 11-08-2011, 01:14 PM
booter booter is offline
Sarnak

booter's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 384
Default

Yeah, the hoop nerf was all wrong. They should have just made the recharge cost astronomical for that item and left resists alone, instead of throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
__________________
Halfling Jesus
  #135  
Old 11-08-2011, 01:43 PM
pickled_heretic pickled_heretic is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think its also up to your discretion to have a thicker skin when engaging in internet arguments :P.
exactly. i don't mind if people sling some mud at me, or others, as long as i am given some discretionary lenience to do it as well. that's how debates in real life work. author credibility is always a factor. ad hominem is not always explicitly a fallacy if it is true and relevant to the topic at hand.
Last edited by pickled_heretic; 11-08-2011 at 01:52 PM..
  #136  
Old 11-08-2011, 01:54 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by booter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, the hoop nerf was all wrong. They should have just made the recharge cost astronomical for that item and left resists alone, instead of throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
Well it did need to be fixed quickly, and the problem is gone. It's a tweak I know the Big Emp can nail down whenever he has a minute. I'm not crying foul at all here, I'm just sayin'.
  #137  
Old 11-08-2011, 01:55 PM
Uaellaen Uaellaen is offline
Planar Protector

Uaellaen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Trakanon is just one example of when it could get used. I used it because it is the premier raid target of the expansion until VP is released, and because he has a known health pool (32k HP). The hoop actually trivializes all current and future raids, not just Trakanon.
rofl, i wanna see you hoop cazic 2.0, or any NToV mob
__________________
[60 High Priest] Uuaellaen (Dark Elf)
[55 Conjurer] Uaellaen (Dark Elf)
[24 Rogue] Uaellaenn (Dark Elf) *retired*
  #138  
Old 11-08-2011, 01:56 PM
Uaellaen Uaellaen is offline
Planar Protector

Uaellaen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 1,161
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by booter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, the hoop nerf was all wrong. They should have just made the recharge cost astronomical for that item and left resists alone, instead of throwing out the baby with the bathwater.
go look up the 17 previous threads where the devs replied that the lifetap "nerf" was going to happen anyway and was in line, changed from unresistable to a negative resist mod afaik, wich it should be ...
__________________
[60 High Priest] Uuaellaen (Dark Elf)
[55 Conjurer] Uaellaen (Dark Elf)
[24 Rogue] Uaellaenn (Dark Elf) *retired*
  #139  
Old 11-08-2011, 02:09 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uaellaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
rofl, i wanna see you hoop cazic 2.0, or any NToV mob
I just wanna see people be able to use their life taps on them [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.].
  #140  
Old 11-08-2011, 03:00 PM
john_savage1982 john_savage1982 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 234
Default

I don't understand why this matter is even being discussed. Anybody who thinks that item recharging was intentional in classic and should exist here on P1999 have their heads in the sand. Does nobody realize how many "bugs" and "exploits" have been removed from P1999 in the name of balance? Item recharging is one of these bugs. I think that it is ridiculous to handle items on a case by case basis - or altering entire lines of spells - in order to try and balance the effects of a known exploit. How does that make sense? What sort of mental gymnastics do yall do to convince yourselves that item recharging makes sense?

I'll be the first to admit that some matters have shades of gray but this is so completely black and white that I'm flabbergasted anybody would even have the audacity to argue otherwise.
Last edited by john_savage1982; 11-08-2011 at 03:03 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:33 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.