Myconid Spore King - Monk Solo

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Spamming the thread doesn't change the fact you attacked me first, and I defended myself. You can't hide the truth in a mountain of spam.

I'm genuinely asking you to stop breaking the forum rules. This is not RnF. If you continue, we're going to assume you're just attacking people and not trying to defend yourself.

[shovelquest]

NO politics.... guys. This isnt a platform to hate on ogres because their city is near freeport (built after oguk)

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So then why the pattern around you? Why was I able to assemble 10 different posters, all (by your own words) attacking you so fast? And we both know the number is much, much higher than ten.

Is it that the forum has all ganged up on you without reason. Can yuo intellectually honestly say that the common denominator (ie. you) had no impact ... despite the fact that no other poster has your "everyone attacks me" problem?

Your fallacy of "everyone attacks poster X, therefore it must be correct" is the silliest nonsense I have ever seen.

Are you claiming that ganging up on someone is justified if enough people do it?

The people attacking me are the ones pressing their respective submit buttons. I did not force you to spam this thread and lie about me. Learn some self control before giving advice to others.

[loramin]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your fallacy of "everyone attacks poster X, therefore it must be correct" is the silliest nonsense I have ever seen.

Are you claiming that ganging up on someone is justified if enough people do it?

The people attacking me are the ones pressing their respective submit buttons. I did not force you to spam this thread and lie about me.

See, now you're being disengenuous again. You're not that dumb: you know that if someone gets their car stolen once it's not their fault ... but if that same person gets their car stolen twenty times, it's probably got something to do with them.

Same thing here. This forum is full of people disagreeing with each other. But all you have to do to shut me up is point out a single other individual, in this forum of disagreement, who feels they've been "attacked" as many times as you have (or even close).

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See, now you're being disengenuous again. You're not that dumb: you know that if someone gets their car stolen once it's not their fault ... but if that same person gets their car stolen twenty times, it's probably got something to do with them.

Same thing here. This forum is full of people disagreeing with each other. But all you have to do to shut me up is point out a single other individual, in this forum of disagreement, who feels they've been "attacked" as many times as you have (or even close).

You turn every thread about EQ items as a teachable moment about DSMs personality.

Why can't you just accept him for who he is?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

See, now you're being disengenuous again. You're not that dumb: you know that if one person gets their car stolen once it's not their fault ... but if the same person gets their car stolen twenty times, it's probably got something to do with them.

Same thing here. This forum is full of people disagreeing with each other. But all you have to do to shut me up is point out a single other individual, in this forum of disagreement, who has been "attacked" as many times as you have (or even close).

Loramin... fallacies ARE disengenuous. I know you are not dumb enough to pretend that the ad populum fallacy has merit. It is a literal fallacy. Your imaginary metric of "most attacked poster" is just another version of the ad populum fallacy. You are the one being disengenuous here by using a fallacy as an argument.

Stealing a car is illegal. It is the fault of the car thief every time they steal your car.

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you claiming that ganging up on someone is justified if enough people do it?

Yes, as shocking as it was for me to read that, he was lol

[loramin]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You turn every thread about EQ items as a teachable moment with a focus on DSMs personality.

Why can't you just accept him for who he is?

Because he's such a great poster when he's posting well, and such a terrible one when he's not.

DSM is not Ripzoko. He's not trying to troll people (until he gets into "fight mode" at least). He knows the game well (even though he often doubles down hard on the parts he doesn't know), he's smart, and he even makes community contributions (eg. his DPS calculator).

I truly think there's a good person behind that keyboard, and I just get so ****ing frustrated when he choses be disengenuous (to score points with the audience in the imaginary arena in his head) rather than just post like the decent person I suspect he is.

[shovelquest]

Saruman had NINE+ wring wrathes.

Are you seriously trying to tell me that you don't think that he deserves the ring?

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Loramin... fallacies ARE disengenuous. I know you are not dumb enough to pretend that the ad populum fallacy has merit. It is a literal fallacy. Your imaginary metric of "most attacked poster" is just another version of the ad populum fallacy. You are the one being disengenuous here by using a fallacy as an argument.

Stealing a car is illegal. It is the fault of the car thief every time they steal your car.

Why are you still breaking the forum rules? I'm begging you to stop. This isn't RnF.