Are we allowed to like AI art?

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Iksar_Knight001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dunno why these AI machines seem to love tattoos…

because everyone under the age of 40 has painted their mental illness on their skin

millenial/gen Z future planning at it's best

[Iksar_Knight001]

Good Harley Quin and only a few tatts but of course tatts on boobs

[Iksar_Knight001]

Sick armor and sword tho

[Iksar_Knight001]

Could be a dark souls character or boss

[Lune]

Who knew Celery Man would be the single most prophetic prediction of the nature of AI emergence than any other piece of media ever

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who knew Celery Man would be the single most prophetic prediction of the nature of AI emergence than any other piece of media ever

OMG I KNOW RIGHT?!??!?!?!

I made this connection imidiatly and was like HOLY SHIT celeryman is how computer jobs are literally going to be this is incrediblel!!!!!

LOLOLOLLOLLL I love you lune. Its 110% AI prompting. And what creative jobs are going to be like in like 10 years.

Drinking coffee like a little work desk btich lol.."hmm, show me some DINOSAURS, with LASERS... oh thats perfect, send this image to Clark, in Creative Approval."

Just like idiocracy you never know what is gonna actually nail the predictions.

[Ekco]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

because everyone under the age of 40 has painted their mental illness on their skin

millenial/gen Z future planning at it's best

yeah, you'd have to curate all the images and only use non tatted ones.

like noone had to tell the thing to draw tatted women, more than 50% of the data it ate had tatted women, the computer prolly literally thinks women are born that way

[Ekco]

>train on human language more than any human could in their entire lifetime
>get told to draw huge melons
>take's users input literally.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

never forget how dumb as fuck these programs actually are.

[Ekco]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've been looking at the raw math for TCO op costs, resale values, required revenue to recoup and upgrade on a 3 year cycle, etc and nothing makes sense

system like this would run 70B models at an aggregate 268 tokens per second and a purchase + first year running cost aggregate of like $415k. electricity at 100% utilization would be like $12.5k per year. I dont know how to specifically amortize personnel but let's just say it takes $50k of people time to manage a unit. three year ownership at a 50% resale rate give total operating cost three years $362500

would generate about 8.4 billion tokens in a year.
362500 / 8.4x3 / 1000 = $14.38 per million token to break even. Not profit and replace system, break even.

my conclusion is this AI craze is destabilizing the world and providing no tangible benefit

people are going to look back at this time the same way we look back on the dot com bubble bursting and all the dumb shit going on then.

chatgpt charges you 2 dollars for a million tokens, when it should be 15 - 20 bucks as a sane business model. and like more than half the internet i assume, like myself aren't paying for any of this shit and just using the daily free amount of all the LLMs to power their dumb ai art / chatbots currently.

who the fuck is paying for this shit, is money even real? what's going on.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Kinda pretty