![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
I was in a group in KC a while back (ugh) and we had a bard puller. He was literally pulling the entire basement to LCY and kiting them around the courtyard while the rest of the group beat on the mobs. We were forced to invite a wizard to the group because he was legally stealing some of the kills from the kite.
| ||
|
#42
|
|||
|
Lol was that Euthenasia?
| ||
|
#43
|
|||
|
Elf laws lol
| ||
|
#44
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#45
|
|||
|
Make the range of Bard AoE smaller so that they cannot hit the mob without being hit themself. Or limit the ability of a Bard to AoE swarm to true outdoor zones only.
| ||
|
#46
|
|||
|
It is incredibly easy to control not only the kite but also the reavers before zoning out. If it's crowded it is easy to just come back later. However, a number of times what ends up happening is a temple or stable group will also pull from arena and moat and then complain about the bard taking other mobs. As long as the bard informs people of the pull it only takes 2 minutes to gather the mobs on the north side of arena.
Arena is never in trouble if the reaver is run to moat before zoning. Moat is never in trouble of pulling floors 2 and 3 if they know the pull is happening and pull along the sides as most groups do. Velks is a cluster fuck, but CoM is the truth. All parties should work together unless the bard is a clown that can't control easily controllable swarms. | ||
|
#47
|
||||
|
Quote:
fuck those bards. and honestly CSR seemingly doesnt give a shit about it | |||
|
#48
|
||||
|
Quote:
Some of the things pointed out are intentionally dumb sounding to highlight how dumb this entire thread is for existing. Analogies can be a powerful thing, for example: Saying a Bard shouldn't be allowed to swarm in X zone is no different than saying enchanters shouldn't be able to charm pets there, that shaman shouldn't be able to root rot with their epic, that druids/wizards shouldn't be able to quad kite. These are all examples of a class using the generally accepted most efficient way to kill mobs. I think we can all agree when you remove bard and apply this same line of thinking to other classes (some i.e. enchanter that people unanimously agree is a far more powerful class than bard) it sounds incredibly stupid. So yes I agree with you, this is in fact (one of) the dumbest threads possible. | |||
|
#49
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#50
|
||||
|
Quote:
With that said, to say what has been described here is a PNP violation, and that CSR doesn't enforce PNP violations isn't really an accurate depiction. Copy and pasting directly from the PNP: In general, if the placeholder or placeholders for a spawn are being killed, that 'camp' can be considered held by the player doing the killing so long as they are keeping the placeholders (or the room if there are no placeholders) cleared, within the same zone, do not die or log off. As you can see the camp rules define that a camp is claimed when the mobs in the camp are consitently being cleared, not when someone is standing in an area staring at a bunch of spawned mobs. The fact that in the examples given the bard was not only able to find enough mobs that were sitting there un-engaged at their spawn points to achieve a kite, but were actually able to find 2-3x more than the 25 limit their pbaoe songs will hit displays that there were clearly pulling from camps that were not already claimed per written letter of the policy. A more accurate depiction of the events is that there are people on P99 that have become so entitled because of how sparse the server is that it has become an expectation that when you exp in an area that you won't encounter other players also trying to do the same thing. Therefore these people operate under the assumption that if any mob in the zone they could possibly consider killing gets contested that its a flagrant foul that should be met with sweeping punishment and class nerfs, when in reality the ruleset gives no one person or entity favoritism over another when it comes to competing for mobs that are not already actively engaged and/or consistently being cleared. Therefore the events that have occurred as described in this thread are in fact ENDORSED by the PNP. Which is the actual reason that CSR isn't taking corrective action, because the players in these examples are in fact following the rules. A ruleset that is designed to ensure that all players in aggregate as a community experience the most amount of opportunities to receive experience and loot but not wasting mobs sitting up at their spawn point. The solution is EXTREMELY SIMPLE. You will never have a camp dispute with someone in P99 if you actually properly hold down your camp. Its not possible for someone to pull mobs out of your camp when the mobs are all dead. Pick a camp you can actually manage, i.e. keep all the spawns dead before repops. Pay attention to respawn timers and IF you have a gap AND there are other mobs in the area sitting up you're fine to kill them to be as efficient as possible, just make sure you're ready for that first repop so you don't risk losing the claim on your actual properly claimed camp. At that point the only thing someone can do to negatively impact your camp is train you or kill steal a mob you're engaged on. Both of which are very clear cut and dry violations of the PNP and therefore CSR will infact enforce if a petition is needed. | |||
![]() |
|
|