Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

cannot back up claims

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

conceding...refusing to answer

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can keep pretending otherwise to dodge this, but everybody can see it. You concede every time you dodge like this.

Thank you for conceding you cannot back up the below claims.
You can keep attempting to dodge the below, but everybody can see it. You concede every time you dodge like this.

You "need" to provide an(y) example of a camp that "needs" a Shaman to substantiate your claim that you can name multiple camps that "need" a Shaman.

You also "need" to provide evidence that supports your tens/dozens/hundreds/thousands of posts in this thread in which you claimed that Shaman can/does improve group's a DPS (more than a non-epic Mage can/does) by root rotting multiple mobs parallel to the group.

I'm not sure if you've forgotten about these things that you claimed - if so, feel free to refresh your memory at any time by re-reading as the post history is clear and visible to all. You're simply not going to get away with making baseless, unsubstantiated claims. It's really not a good look for you.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have an argument that I can point to. You do not. Thank you for the concession.

I concede nothing

ENC / CLR clearly better

Your 'argument' didn't persuade me

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Continuing to spam the thread doesn't make me look bad/wrong, or you look good/correct.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Continuing to spam the thread doesn't make me look bad, or you look good/correct.

lawl how many posts do you have in this thread

Unreal

ENC / CLR better than ENC / SHM btw

[bcbrown]

Is today the day we hit 500?

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Continuing to spam the thread doesn't make me look bad/wrong, or you look good/correct.

If the above Quote was directed toward me, I am neither spamming nor interested in how I look. I am merely continuing the discussion, by re-stating some simple irrefutable facts that DSM has not addressed.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

cannot back up claims

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

conceding...refusing to answer

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can keep pretending otherwise to dodge this, but everybody can see it. You concede every time you dodge like this.

Thank you for conceding you cannot back up the below claims.
You can keep attempting to dodge the below, but everybody can see it. You concede every time you dodge like this.

You "need" to provide an(y) example of a camp that "needs" a Shaman to substantiate your claim that you can name multiple camps that "need" a Shaman.

You also "need" to provide evidence that supports your tens/dozens/hundreds/thousands of posts in this thread in which you claimed that Shaman can/does improve group's a DPS (more than a non-epic Mage can/does) by root rotting multiple mobs parallel to the group.

I'm not sure if you've forgotten about these things that you claimed - if so, feel free to refresh your memory at any time by re-reading as the post history is clear and visible to all. You're simply not going to get away with making baseless, unsubstantiated claims. It's really not a good look for you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lawl how many posts do you have in this thread

Unreal

ENC / CLR better than ENC / SHM btw

As you can see, this spam and nonsense will simply continue.

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everyone agrees with me and you agree with you

I'm fine with that

Incorrect.

Originally Posted by Swish [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shamans are great, and the best unmentioned point here is you don't have to deal with the CH chain in a raid [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you can see, this spam and nonsense will simply continue.

Everyone agrees with me and you agree with you

I'm fine with that

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As you can see, this spam and nonsense will simply continue.

Why? Instead of "spamming nonsense" you could simply provide evidence to support your claims. It really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

cannot back up claims

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

conceding...refusing to answer

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can keep pretending otherwise to dodge this, but everybody can see it. You concede every time you dodge like this.

Thank you for conceding you cannot back up the below claims.
You can keep attempting to dodge the below, but everybody can see it. You concede every time you dodge like this.

You "need" to provide an(y) example of a camp that "needs" a Shaman to substantiate your claim that you can name multiple camps that "need" a Shaman.

You also "need" to provide evidence that supports your tens/dozens/hundreds/thousands of posts in this thread in which you claimed that Shaman can/does improve a group's DPS (more than a non-epic Mage can/does) by root rotting multiple mobs parallel to the group.

I'm not sure if you've forgotten about these things that you claimed - if so, feel free to refresh your memory at any time by re-reading as the post history is clear and visible to all. You're simply not going to get away with making baseless, unsubstantiated claims. It's really not a good look for you."

[Vexenu]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am glad we agree Enchanter/Shaman/Monk is a strong combo. If you knew how this combo worked, you would know removing the Monk does not diminish the power of the Enchanter/Shaman for this four person group.

Shaman/Monk is a great duo, and throwing in an Enchanter is just icing on the cake. A strong duo + the strongest solo class will obviously be a capable trio.

But two can play at this game.

Enchanter/Cleric is even stronger duo than Shaman/Monk. And we can then throw in another Enchanter as icing, the same way you did with your duo. But since everyone knows that Enchanter/Cleric is a stronger duo than Shaman/Monk, our resulting trio of Enchanter/Enchanter/Cleric is stronger than Shaman/Monk/Enchanter.

And given that Monk is a Shaman's best duo partner, SHM/ENC/XXX/XXX (removing the Monk since this is an all priest/caster discussion) will necessarily be weaker than ENC/ENC/CLR/XXX.

Admit it, DSM. You've lost. You must now concede, apologize to the forum, rend your garments and spend three days cloaked in sackcloth and ashes, wailing in repentance for your misdeeds.