Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Lampolo]

Don't you know math? 2+2 equals 4 torpor s3e?

[Gloomlord]

"Shamans are one of the best solo classes. Let's completely ignore the fact this was about 4 people in a group, in a game where some classes specialise in one aspect better than others".

Gotta love his logical reasoning, or lack thereof.

Wizards are the shittiest class in this game, yet even they have their strengths if you accrue enough of them to quickly blast down targets.

Mages are an incredibly good DPS class, despite how 2 dimensional they are as a class overall. They are far more welcome in this hypothetical group than shaman, despite shaman being a more interesting, versatile and powerful class.

[Penish]

watch his shitty solo videos for a good lolortwo

[Lysander]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you enjoy being a self-righteous hypocrite? Have you not read this thread thoroughly enough to determine why people acted the way they did?

The "man" will do anything to "win" an argument by moving the goalposts, calling for evidence in the most ludicrous ways, and ignoring logic. If you've played this game long enough, you'll realise the sheer absurdity of having a shaman root rotting next to a charm group.

And why is he pushing for this argument so badly? To prove that shamans can attain a higher DPS than mages, with him purposefully ignoring how impractical and pointless it is in a realistic scenario.

He deserves everything he gets. Don't you dare deny it and say that we're "trolling".

Hi, I'll play forum quest with you for a bit. No I did not read a 380 page thread that I just found yesterday thoroughly because I am not insane. You need to tone it down, calling me a self-righteous hypocrite is quite rude.

I agree that I do not want my shaman root rotting my charm pet group or a DPS shaman in my group. The fact that DSM seems extremely determined to win the argument at all costs really should have nothing to do you, you seem to take it personally as an affront to you. The correct way to deal with crazy people who won't shut up and are wrong is to leave them alone and not engage, and then eventually they will stop. Even DSM would get bored after 5 or 6 consecutive posts. I think most people learned this when they were in high school. You don't fight crazy by shouting in their ear until they give up. Are you going to start arguing with the local homeless man near you? Have the thousands of people argue with flat earth truthers gotten anywhere? No, what you do is ignore crazy and just let them fizzle out. If DSM is so batshit crazy and wrong, like literally who cares? Is it boo-hoo poor accidental reader of the forums is going to read bad advice. Good. From what I can tell classic is all about people telling people bad advice like warriors that their best stat is intelligence or whatever. And I think people are pretty good at knowing who is right or wrong in an internet argument.

DSM is pushing his argument so badly because that's the way he is and he thinks he's right. The amount of mad displayed from you by DSM moving goal posts or whatever is laughable. I agree he deserves everything he gets because he's replying back endlessly, the unfortunate thing is that he seems to be coping much better and has a lot more stamina than you, while you are so butthurt it's showing on my screen. He is definitely trolling back and maybe you should stop engaging once it gets to "sorry you don't got x", and "glad you admit you're wrong." I don't know why you think everyone has to be right all the time on the internet. Maybe you could let someone be wrong on the internet? When you get mad and start insulting him and calling him autistic, you really aren't winning, no matter how much more DPS mages do than Shamans.

I stand by my point that everyone should be grateful that DSM was willing argue for 370 pages. it was hilarious and if you didn't think it was hilarious why did you keep posting really? Did you really think you were gonna get him to stop? After 200 pages he was gonna give up on page 250? You seem like your whole goal is to get him to stop posting and admit that you're right and that he is autistic and that he owes you for showing him the truth, like this is some kind of communist struggle session. I didn't know it's wrong that people have different opinions. Is it evil to insist 2+2=3?

[Ripqozko]

Originally Posted by Lysander [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hi, I'll play forum quest with you for a bit. No I did not read a 380 page thread that I just found yesterday thoroughly because I am not insane. You need to tone it down, calling me a self-righteous hypocrite is quite rude.

I agree that I do not want my shaman root rotting my charm pet group or a DPS shaman in my group. The fact that DSM seems extremely determined to win the argument at all costs really should have nothing to do you, you seem to take it personally as an affront to you. The correct way to deal with crazy people who won't shut up and are wrong is to leave them alone and not engage, and then eventually they will stop. Even DSM would get bored after 5 or 6 consecutive posts. I think most people learned this when they were in high school. You don't fight crazy by shouting in their ear until they give up. Are you going to start arguing with the local homeless man near you? Have the thousands of people argue with flat earth truthers gotten anywhere? No, what you do is ignore crazy and just let them fizzle out. If DSM is so batshit crazy and wrong, like literally who cares? Is it boo-hoo poor accidental reader of the forums is going to read bad advice. Good. From what I can tell classic is all about people telling people bad advice like warriors that their best stat is intelligence or whatever. And I think people are pretty good at knowing who is right or wrong in an internet argument.

DSM is pushing his argument so badly because that's the way he is and he thinks he's right. The amount of mad displayed from you by DSM moving goal posts or whatever is laughable. I agree he deserves everything he gets because he's replying back endlessly, the unfortunate thing is that he seems to be coping much better and has a lot more stamina than you, while you are so butthurt it's showing on my screen. He is definitely trolling back and maybe you should stop engaging once it gets to "sorry you don't got x", and "glad you admit you're wrong." I don't know why you think everyone has to be right all the time on the internet. Maybe you could let someone be wrong on the internet? When you get mad and start insulting him and calling him autistic, you really aren't winning, no matter how much more DPS mages do than Shamans.

I stand by my point that everyone should be grateful that DSM was willing argue for 370 pages. it was hilarious and if you didn't think it was hilarious why did you keep posting really? Did you really think you were gonna get him to stop? After 200 pages he was gonna give up on page 250? You seem like your whole goal is to get him to stop posting and admit that you're right and that he is autistic and that he owes you for showing him the truth, like this is some kind of communist struggle session. I didn't know it's wrong that people have different opinions. Is it evil to insist 2+2=3?

VQ alt to the rescue

[Gloomlord]

Okay, first of all: I never called DSM autistic. My very first post on this thread last year was saying to everyone else to stop calling him autistic. This right here suggests you just want to be self-righteous.

Secondly: yes, I am angry with him. It's not laughable, you hypocrite. It makes sense why someone would be infuriated with someone arguing in the most disingenuous manner possible.

You would also do well to realise I even addressed a similar person to you making the same argument: some people have a personal desire to destroy illogical and insane behaviour. I am one such person.

DSM is equally welcome to ignore this thread if he believes us to be trolls and/or insane and stupid. That goes both ways.

Stop giving an immoral person ammunition, I beg you.

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

VQ alt to the rescue

Who in their right mind would defend DSM?

He's not even a misguided nice guy. He's a complete sanctimonious arsehole in addition to the fact he has mental issues.

He thinks hiding behind faux-polite behaviour will conceal his actual personality, but he's too unintelligent to realise his sophistry completely derails that attempted deception.

[Lysander]

hope mods catch on and move this to rnf soon.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who in their right mind would defend DSM?

He's not even a misguided nice guy. He's a complete sanctimonious arsehole in addition to the fact he has mental issues.

He thinks hiding behind faux-polite behaviour will conceal his actual personality, but he's too unintelligent to realise his sophistry completely derails that attempted deception.

Please keep posting nonsense. It just discredits you further. I can just sit back and watch.

[Gloomlord]

Originally Posted by Lysander [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

hope mods catch on and move this to rnf soon.

So why didn't they last year?