![]() |
|
#2371
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of course. I have provided hard evidence directly from the game. You haven't.
__________________
| |||
|
#2372
|
||||
|
Quote:
DSM: Uhhhh, yes, it is! That takes out all the variables! Everyone: But then how is that parse accurate to the discussion at hand? DSM: My solo parse is the most accurate we're getting to the truth! Everyone: I don't know, that sounds kind of stupid to us. DSM: INSULTS! ALL YOU HAVE ARE INSULTS! TROLLS! | |||
|
#2373
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
|
#2376
|
|||
|
If I could buy calls on this thread count I'd be leveraged to the hilt.
Also, I keep the shaman "I winz" spell in my top slot so I can clickie refresh and chain cast because it casts all my utility and healing and DPS spells instantly and also root rots all mobs within 200 clicks of my loc. | ||
|
#2377
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | |||
|
#2378
|
|||
|
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You guys think he's pretending to be busy irl like he said earlier? He's obviously still online and reading all this
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
|
#2379
|
|||
|
and then he goes offline. Weird coincidence.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
![]() |
|
|