![]() |
|
#1631
|
|||
|
I love how DSM keeps resorting to root rotting whenever mage DPS is undeniably better.
As if 2 enchanters would want some moron off at the sides root rotting, rather than a mage increasing the kill speed on one mob. | ||
|
#1632
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
LOLE.jpg | |||||
|
#1633
|
|||
|
Also, no one is saying you couldn't theoretically meet or surpass mage dps by root-rotting non-high level Sebilis mobs (certainly not ilis frogs or wizards) off to the side.
We're saying most 4-man caster groups would rather have a largely irrelevant mage increasing single target dps as the enchanter pets melt 1 mob at a time, along with their other perks; than an almost entirely irrelevant shaman off-healing OR doing some dumbass root-rotting of adds off to the side in order to dps. Just to reiterate, it's possible, it's just retarded. | ||
|
#1634
|
|||
|
If the shaman plans on root rotting, why is he even in this hypothetical group to begin with?
Does DSM have such a narrow minded view in his pathetic quest to prove how good shamans are? | ||
|
#1635
|
|||
|
I am glad to see people are now admitting the fourth member's DPS is irrelevant.
Now that DPS is off the table, Mage's have nothing to offer. Shamans have superior charm break safety, and superior Malo capabilities. Unless you need CoTH, there really is no reason for a Mage. If you prefer a Mage over a Shaman, that is fine, nobody has ever said you can't have a preference.
__________________
| ||
|
#1636
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why do you keep lying? | |||
|
#1637
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
| ||||||
|
#1638
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||||||
|
#1639
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#1640
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
![]() |
|
|