I Trust the FBI and You Should Too

[Homesteaded]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You ever been arrested, dude?

Yes. What does that have to do with the FBI and the search warrant? Since you can't seem to piece it together, they lied about what they took.

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Homesteaded [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes. What does that have to do with the FBI and the search warrant? Since you can't seem to piece it together, they lied about what they took.

Yeah cops lie. Duh. Assuming I like the FBI because I despise conservatives, good on you.

[Danth]

Robayon's a near-anarchist so it's a pretty safe assumption he dislikes most government-backed law enforcement on general principle.

That being said on a public forum it's also fair to assume that most folks can't keep track of everyone else as different names pop in and out of discussion. That's fair enough. It annoys me too when republicans assume I'm a democrat and democrats assume I'm a republican because neither of them can see the world except through that very limited lens, but usually they seem on balance more interested in throwing mud at each other than worrying about pesky details.

[cd288]

Trump's court filing he made about the search was the oddest thing I've ever read as a lawyer. First, he's making a filing like nearly 3 weeks after a search was conducted. Really odd just in terms of timing.

Second, his filing says that he is asking for the documents back so he can give them to the National Archives. Which is really odd because the whole reason they had to search his property was because he WOULDN'T give them to the National Archives.

Third, he said the search was super aggressive and the same result could have been accomplished with less invasive means. Which is odd because he was the one who refused to comply/cooperate with any less invasive means/requests, which was what necessitated getting a search warrant.

This is the type of frivolous motion that courts will sanction people for. I doubt that will happen here given it's a former President so it's high profile, but seriously this is one of the worst most frivolous motions I've seen.

[Jibartik]

Trump is probably the most well versed master of frivolous court shenanangins so you can bet yo as he will come out on top with this one then.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump is probably the most well versed master of frivolous court shenanangins so you can bet yo as he will come out on top with this one then.

Think you're misunderstanding "frivolous" in this context. When I use that word I mean the legal court meaning where you're filing a motion without any merit whatsoever just to purposefully antagonize and waste time.

Another thing to remember is that many of the thing that people read as "Trump filing" in the past are really filed by people or organizations he's connected to (for example, the filings in the current Trump organization case). So he's not on the hook for those motions even though some of them are possibly frivolous.

[Reiwa]

DC is like EQ raiding, everyone is a vexatious litigant!🐱

[Toxigen]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Castle2.0]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump's court filing he made about the search was the oddest thing I've ever read as a lawyer. First, he's making a filing like nearly 3 weeks after a search was conducted. Really odd just in terms of timing.

Second, his filing says that he is asking for the documents back so he can give them to the National Archives. Which is really odd because the whole reason they had to search his property was because he WOULDN'T give them to the National Archives.

Third, he said the search was super aggressive and the same result could have been accomplished with less invasive means. Which is odd because he was the one who refused to comply/cooperate with any less invasive means/requests, which was what necessitated getting a search warrant.

This is the type of frivolous motion that courts will sanction people for. I doubt that will happen here given it's a former President so it's high profile, but seriously this is one of the worst most frivolous motions I've seen.

I don't know dude. FoxNews told me they asked for a set of documents which OrangeMan gave them. They didn't ask for the documents on their unconstitutional raid in advance. They could have, but didn't. That's the point.

You gotta tune in and get some BuyGold TV ads. Get with the program.

[Elizondo]