#111
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
#112
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details. | |||
#113
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
#114
|
|||
|
I'm done trying to debate this with you. Insulting me with this "goalpost moving" nonsense (when I've consistently said the same thing throughout this entire discussion) just shows you're not an honest debater, and are simply trying to make any claim you can to "win" (to what end, I honestly don't know).
__________________
Loramin Frostseer, Oracle of the Tribunal <Anonymous> and Fan of the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details. | ||
#115
|
|||
|
I remember my time in Classic with my enchanter and Bard. I charmed more with my Bard because the risk of getting rocked only seemed manageable with my flimsy Bard plate mail.
I didn’t pet charm with my enchanter. I don’t remember if that was due to it being too dangerous or if I “didn’t know” to do so. I just leveled a Magician to 48 and just swapped to play an Enchanter because I watched a buddy I was leveling with be a 1-man group to themselves. I am having a blast now with my enchanter, and although I had fun leveling my Magician, there is no contest on which class is the better pet/solo class right now. | ||
#116
|
||||
|
Quote:
if you were truly concerned abuout things not being classic, on top of your list would shaman torpor tanking everything solo. there were 5 to 10 times as many enchnters doing the shit you claim they werent doing than were torpor shamans soloing high end mobs. So how could you possibly get it so wrong? that said, itreally does make the cynical intepretaton of your 'evidence' quite compelling, if i do say. | |||
#117
|
|||
|
The entire, "Nobody did it back then because internet connection" nonsense is almost appalling. Sorry you were a teen in the sticks while many of us had plenty of bandwidth elsewhere.
Confirmation bias and feelings are not conducive to pragmatic conversation. | ||
#118
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, your call for pragmatism, while contributing nothing but your own feelings at the same time is pretty amusing as well. It doesnt make you look useful, or smart. Quite the opposite, actually. While I was that teen in the sticks that you descirbe, your education apparently never advanced beyond one. Learn some reading comprehension. | ||||
#119
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Gorgen (Blue) - Agnostic Troll Warrior of the XXXI Dung | |||
#120
|
||||
|
Quote:
Truth is, it wasn't as simple as people just didn't have access to cable. While it is true that a significant portion ofthe population could not actually get cable, "the sticks" as you say, i'd wager that the majority of people who didn't have cable or better COULD have had cable. The problem was having to convince mumsy and/or dadsy to shell out 150+ dollars a month so you can more effectively stare at elf tiddies all day, a habbit they are already increasingly concerned with. needless to say, many kids couldn't formulate the right pitch to sell their parent(s) on it, especially since they were already paying for a second phone line most likely. And ya 150ish is about right if they hadn't already been using cable(adjusted for inflation). Even as a young adullt having to shell at that kind of cash when you are just starting out in life is not particularly appealing. | |||
|
|