Afghanistan Megathread

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Ennewi [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If I was an actor with a role in something like Waiting For Godot? Yes, but many homeless people rather than one. Go directly to the source of something to understand it. Cut out the news, the statistics, etc.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down...ris_and_London





It's a good read. IIRC Anthony Bourdain recommended it years ago because there's cooking in it, well, using the term loosely. Cooking with quotation marks.



Your words, not mine. There are exceptions as always, so believing any one person based solely on their background is not advisable. People have motives, biases, etc. Roll for perception.



A homeless person would know what all resources were available in their area, from professionals and others without homes, but they wouldn't necessarily have the know-how in order to feed others on a large scale.

https://rgreenhagen.medium.com/how-c...e-dabde995b81f



Picking and choosing things the average person wouldn't know, homeless or otherwise, while overlooking what information one would need to have when on the street.





The human body is still very much beyond our complete understanding, particularly the brain. Bodies aren't experiences but an evolved means through which we experience such external things as homelessness, which are evident. Doctors still take into account feedback from their patients and patients can seek out a second opinion, because not all doctors are good at what they do and each body/brain varies with a complex personal and familial history. But the scientific community is a reliable enough source of information because they devote their time to that. There aren't people who are scienceless, not even those who are science-deniers. Similarly, it would be absurd to call homeless people home-deniers.

Oh but they can be home deniers as well.

Consider the friars

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Is building gallows protected speech too?

A gallow is a platform with holes in it.....

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Orwell came from Greece, Had a thirst for knowledge. Studied sculpture at Saint Martin’s College.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well 1. I never called you legally retarded, and 2. I know plenty of low IQ people who can afford mortgages in certain areas of the country...such as the area where you probably live based on your posts.

At least I know how home buying works, unlike you who thinks people just buy their homes with cash all at once. And I live in AZ, I’ve said numerous times on this forum

The reality is you didn’t identify specific anything about my post that gives any indication of IQ. You are just another whiny libtard who doesn’t like my politics. And no I don’t believe you know a bunch of low IQ people, and anonymous people on the internet don’t count. I don’t believe you know many people at all. I don’t believe you venture outside your home much if at all. I believe you are a whiny piece of shit keyboard warrior who no one would miss if you died, or even notice until the smell from the shithole you live in alerted the neighbors

But hey, I’m just inferring like you did

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh but they can be home deniers as well.

Consider the friars

And the Frasiers, homeless-deniers.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Gwaihir [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A gallow is a platform with holes in it.....

Kinda like facebook and twitter then!

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Kinda like facebook and twitter then!

/rimshot

[Ennewi]

Originally Posted by Smoofers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

back up in your ass with the insurrection

Oval Office Space

[Baler]

It's sad that there are project 1999 members thinking jan 6th is more serious than the Taliban in Afghanistan.

I thought this was a more mature community that has been on the internet for years.

Knowing that some of these people are provocateurs or have been so deeply brainwashed, it's sickening.

Think for yourself before it's too late. Don't let anyone put words in your mouth.

[Gwaihir]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's sad that there are project 1999 members thinking jan 6th is more serious than the Taliban in Afghanistan.

I thought this was a more mature community that has been on the internet for years.

Knowing that some of these people are provocateurs or have been so deeply brainwashed, it's sickening.

Think for yourself before it's too late. Don't let anyone put words in your mouth.

I'm not saying there aren't degrees/gradients of severity.

If in the desire to impose Will upon others, desire devolves to action (violence), then we can assume that along the road to that violence are degrees of severity culminating in violence.

However, in the perspective of BLM insurrection, explicit violence was invoked as a platform for voicing a desire to restore a platform perceptibly lost by those invoking the violence.

Likewise, in the perspective of the electorial insurrection, implicit violence was expressed as a platform for voicing a desire to restore a platform perceptively lost by those participating in implying the threat of violence.

Likewise, in the perspective of the indigenous people of Afghanistan, of which includes the Taliban, explicit violence is being expressed as a platform for voicing a desire to restore a platform perceptively lost by those conducting the violence.

We have three aspects out of the four necessary to decode this connundrum and unless reconciled, creates a divisive rift that culminates in further estrangement threatening the prospect of global violence.

No one wants to give up their position to satisfy the antithesis, as they feel extorted and or forced into this avenue.

Note, the least common denominator in all three of these manifestations, is the US government.