IS Hillary Clinton just insane?

[Slathar]

Originally Posted by dafier [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

OP is angering the sheep. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

yeah im so mad right now im going to buy some iodine from the infowars website to protect myself from all these liberals who use things like facts and evidence-based arguments.


p.s. get a job

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by Baler [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

She has never been hopped up on so many amphetamines in the past years she is finally starting to break down and lose it completely. Name one time before this election process where she seemed so awake and attentive to questions.
She is doping with performance enhancing drugs to try and cheat.

Clearly becoming more obvious that she can't handle the job. Let alone the responsibilities.

I wonder if bill is her dealer.

This. Those head jerks are called amphetamine ticks.

[big_ole_jpn]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This. Those head jerks are called amphetamine ticks.

never forget: http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...illary+cocaine

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently people derive a sense of control and feeling of superiority from believing in so-called conspiracy theories. No matter how complex the theory is it allows the adherant to understand the incredibly complex world in relatively simple terms. People are reduced to charicatures and entire populations are split along two sides.

They 'know the truth' whereas most other people (or should I say 'sheople') are sleeping and 'need to wake up'. This allows for a feeling of superiority. Screeching on an online forum to the 5 people that may possibly actually read it somehow in their mind constitutes a believable forewarning worthy of being heeded and when things go wrong they are there to remind us how they 'told us so!'.

Armchair online activism is mistaken for actual activism. Lazily reading websites marred by the mixture of facts with conjecture (but presented as fact) with no regard whatsoever for cognitive bias is mistaken for actual research.
The obvious arrogance and contempt is poorly hidden through humour and 'playful' jabs. New problems are looked upon gleefully as they confirm what they supposedly already knew. Although they claim to want solutions above all this is a lie (one they themselves believe). Problems being solved is the opposite of what they want as it takes away their (imaginary) special status.

They come in all different forms and it's impossible to stereotype them accurately but one common factor is that they are in no way as smart as they think they are.

wow that's a lot of effort and time into an ad hominem. Just think if you put that time and effort into something substantial, like actual research of a topic. And over time, as you keep at it, days, months years, decades, you might understand a plethora of topics that you too could confidently discuss with others.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by AzzarTheGod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This. Those head jerks are called amphetamine ticks.

I wonder I wonder if she's on Adderall (Amphetamine Salt Combo). She's been on Lovenox since 98. She has in the past reported experiencing blurred vision and confusion which is likely from the Lovenox prescription. An obvious offset to the symptoms is to take Adderall, which is basically a form of amphetamine for ADHD type symptoms.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Csihar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Apparently people derive a sense of control and feeling of superiority from believing in so-called conspiracy theories. No matter how complex the theory is it allows the adherant to understand the incredibly complex world in relatively simple terms. People are reduced to charicatures and entire populations are split along two sides.

They 'know the truth' whereas most other people (or should I say 'sheople') are sleeping and 'need to wake up'. This allows for a feeling of superiority. Screeching on an online forum to the 5 people that may possibly actually read it somehow in their mind constitutes a believable forewarning worthy of being heeded and when things go wrong they are there to remind us how they 'told us so!'.

Armchair online activism is mistaken for actual activism. Lazily reading websites marred by the mixture of facts with conjecture (but presented as fact) with no regard whatsoever for cognitive bias is mistaken for actual research.
The obvious arrogance and contempt is poorly hidden through humour and 'playful' jabs. New problems are looked upon gleefully as they confirm what they supposedly already knew. Although they claim to want solutions above all this is a lie (one they themselves believe). Problems being solved is the opposite of what they want as it takes away their (imaginary) special status.

They come in all different forms and it's impossible to stereotype them accurately but one common factor is that they are in no way as smart as they think they are.

You hit the nail on the fucking head

[Ahldagor]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

wow that's a lot of effort and time into an ad hominem. Just think if you put that time and effort into something substantial, like actual research of a topic. And over time, as you keep at it, days, months years, decades, you might understand a plethora of topics that you too could confidently discuss with others.

That's not an ad hominem, but an explanation of a mindset. You're a moron. (PS, that last sentence is an ad hominem)

[Jarnauga]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Ahldagor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not an ad hominem, but an explanation of a mindset. You're a moron. (PS, that last sentence is an ad hominem)

"ad hominem"
1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
"vicious ad hominem attacks"
2.
relating to or associated with a particular person.
"the office was created ad hominem for Fenton"

"an explanation of a mindset"
1. (no entries found)

And really, the whole "conspiracy theorist" thing, it's not just one camp, as like I've pointed out this week here it also comes out of the liberals, just bad though [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]. You know, the whole thing before Snowden was just a "conspiracy theory"? Yaaap! Yes, two can play at that game, just some are no good at it [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[R Flair]

at this point people who don't see truth in what were formerly conspiracy theories (now its just reality) then you just aren't paying attention

shits just right out in the open now - ie. no longer a need to theorize